From: Dr. Bob Klein (drbob@troop111.org)
Date: Fri Feb 01 2002 - 09:57:19 CST
Greetings to All.
Over the past three months, a fair number of people have been asking me
to put out my second, "enhanced" version of the Philmont Pain Index
(PPI). So here it is, now termed: The Philmont Challenge Index (PCI).
The name change is to both keep the PCI distinct from the original PPI,
and (frankly) to appease those who felt that the term "Philmont Pain
Index" was too negative a way to look at Philmont.
Background: The PPI was a formula that enabled individual trekkers to
determine <a priori> how challenging a specific trek would be for
themselves. This involves many factors, some of which are objective and
can be formally measured, while others of which are completely
subjective. The PPI was an effort to meld the objective and subjective
criteria into something measurable and useful.
Following the publication of the original PPI (January 5th, 2001, on the
bowline.org Philmont List), I solicited for and to date have received
feedback from over 100 Scouters, about half a dozen (self-identified)
Philmont Rangers, and about a dozen Scouts. The collective results from
about the first 75 responses was published on bowline.org on August
21st, 2001 (just before Doug Gentry folded the tents there), and
generated a second wave of followup responses. The PPI was modified in
accordance with all of this feedback to give the current PCI. Thanks to
one and all who provided feedback, whether positive (most) or negative
(a few).
Regretably, the new PCI is a longer and somewhat more complex formula
versus the original PPI. This, of course, was inevitable. Versus the
PPI, the PCI now includes a standardization mechanism to adjust for
variations in the amount of food and water being carried out of
Basecamp, corrects for "willow" trekkers who are *below* their Philmont
recommended weight, adds a trek difficulty factor, modifies and
simplifies the age factor, adds new factors for smoking and high
altitude/mountainous residence or training, gives increased credit for
doing multiple Philmont *or Philmont-like* backpacking treks, and
(slightly) shifts the analysis scale to the right. This is in
accordance with (most of) the suggestions and comments provided in the
collective feedback. Other, more hair-splitting suggestions were not
incorporated (I'm splitting enough hairs as it is!)
Hopefully, the increased complexity and modifications equate to
increased accuracy. However, at some point one has to throw one's hands
up and simply state: "Minimize your pack weight, get your personal
weight down, and get yourself in great shape, and you'll have a
wonderful trek. Or go ahead and convince yourself that you're too busy,
too athletic, or too tough to have to bother with any of that silly crap
- and have anywhere from a mediocre to a truly miserable experience.
It's completely up to you." Remember, the PCI is only a TOOL that can
help you see what factors you can control, which factors you cannot
control, and how to help yourself improve your personal Philmont
experience, at least from a *physical* point of view. Viewed
dispassionately, the results will give at least a qualitative sense for
the relative merits of changes in the controllable parameters. Or if
you prefer, to give a stark, final warning....
See you on the trail (yes, I am going this summer! (717))
- Dr. Bob Klein, SM-111, Arlington, VA
The Philmont Challenge Index Formula
------------------------------------
The formula requires the following data input: pack weight (PW), food
weight adjustment (FWA), water weight adjustment (WWA), weight of the
trekker (TW), Philmont recommended weight (RW), length of the trek (TL),
trek difficulty factor (TDF), an age factor (AF), a smoking factor (SF),
a high altitude/mountainous training/residence factor (HAMTRF), a
physical preparation factor (PPF), and a prior Philmont-like trek
experience factor (PPLTEF). These parameters and several needed
assumptions are explained below. The formula is as follows:
X = [(PW+FWA+WWA)/(PW+FWA+WWA+TW)] x [(TW/RW) *or* (RW/TW), whichever is
higher] x TL x TDF x AF x SF x HAMTRF x PPF x PPLTEF
Comments and Assumptions:
------------------------
X = Challenge Index Value - [See interpretation scale at the bottom.]
PW - Pack Weight - This is the trekker's complete pack weight when
leaving Basecamp on Day II, as measured by the Welcome Center Scale,
including all requisite equipment, food, fuel, and water.
FWA and WWA - Food Weight Adjustment and Water Weight Adjustment. These
factors standardize all pack weights to the default values of 3 days
worth of food (that is, 3 days til the first commissary pickup of food,
fuel, and other consumables), and 3 liters of water. On food, if you
are carrying:
1 day's worth - your FWA is 4 pounds
2 day's worth - your FWA is 2 pounds
3 day's worth - your FWA is 0 pounds
4 day's worth - your FWA is -2 pounds (that is, *subtract* 2
pounds)
Similarly, on water, if you are carrying:
1 liter - your WWA is 4 pounds (but don't be dumb - put another
liter in your pack!)
2 liters - your WWA is 2 pounds
3 liters - your WWA is 0 pounds
4 liters - your WWA is -2 pounds (that is, *subtract* 2 pounds)
TW - Trekker's Weight - The trekker's weight upon arrival at Basecamp
(you can measure yourself during your Basecamp medical checks, or
guesstimate based on your weight when you left home, adding 1 pound for
each day since you left. If this latter addition seems excessive,
consider that "planes, trains, and automobiles" (and buses), little or
no exercise, and lots of fast food, are not exactly conducive to weight
maintenance on the way to Philmont).
RW - Recommended Weight - The Philmont recommended weight for a
trekker's height (listed below; note that the listed values are the
straight averages of the ranges provided by Philmont). The term
[(TW/RW) *or* (RW/TW)] is a weight factor, adjusting for those who are
above (TW/RW) or below (RW/TW) their recommended weight (that is, always
use whichever of the two values is HIGHER (greater than 1.00)). Those
rare individuals who are dead on their recommended weights default to
1.00, of course.
Philmont Recommended Weights
----------------------------
Use these values ONLY for RW's:
5-0 118
5-1 122
5-2 126
5-3 130
5-4 134
5-5 138
5-6 143
5-7 147
5-8 152
5-9 157
5-10 160
5-11 165
6-0 170
6-1 175
6-2 179
6-3 184
6-4 189
6-5 194
6-6 199
6-7 205
It is appreciated that these average values do not take body physiology
into account. However, physiology IS taken somewhat into account in the
pack weight percentage subequation, since the Trekker Weight is in the
*denominator* (that is, [(PW+FWA+WWA)/(PW+FWA+WWA+TW)]).
TL - Trek Length - Scheduled (or Planned) Trek Length In Miles.
TDF - Trek Difficulty Factor - A multiplier based on Philmont's
categorization of treks as typical, rugged, strenuous, or
superstrenuous. [As one of my alpha-evaluators commented, a "strenuous"
60 mile trek is more difficult than a "rugged" 60 mile trek, even though
both cover an identical distance. And in fact, most of the responders
who felt that the original PPI overestimated their challenge level were
on "typical" or "rugged" treks.] The TDF multipliers are as follows:
Typical 0.90
Rugged 0.95
Strenuous 1.00
Super-Strenuous 1.05
AF - Age Factor - a means for guesstimating AVERAGE overall experience,
general physical condition, and mental and emotional ability to handle a
trek. The multipliers are as follows:
14 or 15 years old 1.25
16 - 21 years old 1.00
22 - 30 years old 1.15
31 - 40 years old 1.25
41 - 55 years old 1.35
Over 55 years old 1.50
SF - Smoking Factor - a neutral to highly negative factor, as follows:
Never Smoked 1.00
Smoked at one time, but quit 1.05
Light smoker (< 2 packs/week) 1.15
Moderate smoker (ca. 1 pack/day) 1.25
Heavy smoker (> 2 packs/day) 1.50
HAMTRF - High Altitude/Mountainous Training/Residence Factor - Do you
live at or above 3,500 feet elevation, *OR* will you be spending more
than 3 days at or above 5,000 feet (for example, in Colorado Springs)
just before hitting the Ranch, *OR* do you live and train in a
mountainous area (regardless of altitude)?
No 1.00
Yes 0.95
PPF - Physical Preparation Factor - a means for estimating how much
effort a trekker has put into physically preparing for Philmont. The
multipliers (and explanations) are as follows:
Extensive 1.00
Moderate 1.15
Minimal 1.35
None 1.50
Extensive prep is defined as everyday or nearly everyday backpacking,
carrying a heavy pack, for a minimum of 1 hour per day for at least 2
months prior to the trek start date, plus a minimum of 2 "realistic"
backpacking shakedown events (10 miles minimum, including at least 2,000
feet of elevation change, or 15 miles minimum with a lesser amount of
elevation change), during the 2 months prior to the trek. "Extensive
Prep" is rigorously defined as *weight-bearing practice* that toughens
up your weight-bearing points (shoulders, hips, and feet), as
differentiated from simple aerobic (cardiovascular) exercising.
Moderate prep is everyday or nearly everyday aerobic exercising (hiking,
running, cycling, high-activity sports, treadmill, etc.), with
occasional backpacking practice (1 - 2 per week), for a minimum of 1
hour per day for at least 2 months prior to the trek, plus 1 realistic
backpacking shakedown event (as defined above), during the 2 months
prior to the trek.
Minimal prep is occasional (3 - 5 per week) aerobic exercising, for a
minimum of 1 hour per day for at least 1 month prior to the trek. [Note
that this is where most H.S.-athlete-Scouts fall.]
None is anything less than the Minimal category. [Note that this is
where more than half of all Advisors, and most non-H.S.-athlete-Scouts,
fall.]
PPLTEF - Prior Philmont-Like Trek Experience Factor - Previous Philmont
treks *or Philmont-like treks* WITHIN THE PAST 5 SUMMERS reduce the
challenge level. A "Philmont-like trek" means a backpacking trek
covering at least 50 miles and at least 7 days. THIS IMPLIES CREDIBLE
UNDERSTANDING AND CORRECT PRACTICE OF BASIC PHILMONT STYLE BACKPACKING
PROTOCOLS, such as the caterpillar technique, dawn-to-dusk scheduling,
early morning hiking, proper outfitting, etc. "Knowledge is Power."
The multipliers are as follows:
0 1.00
1 0.95
2 0.90
3 or more 0.85
X Factor Evaluation Chart
-------------------------
Based on my personal experiences and observations, and the comments
derived from the collective feedback, the values derived from the PCI
may be evaluated as follows:
< 15 Great Job! - Lightly Challenging - Easy Trekking.
15 - 20 Good Job - Somewhat Challenging
20 - 27.5 Moderately Challenging
27.5 - 35 Highly Challenging - Should Try to Improve
35 - 40 Extremely Challenging - Must Try to Improve
40 - 45 Hellish - Needs *Radical* Improvement!
Over 45 Potential Darwin Award Winner - Probably Shouldn't Go
Let's take another look at my 2000 Trek (used as Example # 1 on the
original PPI formula). In 2000, my pack weight started out just under
40 pounds. We were on Trek 30, so we were carrying 3 days of food.
However, I carried only 2 liters of water out of Basecamp, since we were
walking from Six Mile Gate to Indian Writings to start (a flat, 4 mile
hike starting at 8:30 am, so no need for 3 liters). I weighed about 160
pounds at my medical check (this is a guess; I didn't actually weigh
myself, but I left home weighing 154 and chowed down pretty good in
Colorado). I'm 5-6, so my recommended weight was 143. We took an
enhanced version of Trek 30, equalling about 85 miles total; the trek
was (originally) rated strenuous, and the modifications did not (IMHO)
jump it to superstrenuous. I was 44 years old. I have never smoked.
We spent 3 full days in Colorado before heading to the Ranch. My
physical preparation level was "Extensive." I had completed 3 or more
Philmont or Philmont-like backpacking treks during the 5 previous
summers 1995 - 1999. Thus:
X = [(PW+FWA+WWA)/(PW+FWA+WWA+TW)] x [(TW/RW) *or* (RW/TW), whichever
is higher] x TL x TDF x AF x SF x HAMTRF x PPF x PPLTEF
X = [42/202] x (160/143) x 85 x 1.00 x 1.35 x 1.00 x 0.95 x 1.00
x 0.85 = 21.6 (Low end of Moderately Challenging)
For comparison sake, my original PPI was 21.0 - so not much of a change
for me personally - but that was because the new factors defaulted to
1.00 or 0.95 for my particular situation.
Since this treatise is already long enough, I have deleted the other
previously detailed examples. I think the one example is adequate to
see how the formula works. If anyone has any questions or difficulties,
you are free to email me directly at: drbob@troop111.org
Final Comments: Please note that this formula is designed to gauge the
AVERAGE trekker, and exceptions to the rule are just that! Obviously,
this cannot properly gauge trekkers with significant physical, mental,
or emotional problems, ridiculously poor equipment, bad training, or
crappy attitudes; nor can it handle Joe Stud Ranger, his female
equivalent, or their real-world compatriots - in all such cases, a
little common sense has to be employed.
Once again, I hope everyone finds this exercise to be useful. I also
(still) hope no-one feels the need to give a mighty Tarzan yell, beat
his naked chest with his fists, and crow about what a macho guy he was
for enduring a Challenge Index Value of 47.2 (or whatever) on his last
trek. Once again, the intent of the PCI is to help you AVOID such a
fate, not revel after enduring it. No Pain = No Pain; this is a GOOD
thing!
Yours in Scouting,
- Dr. Bob
[Excel Program Available! Tom Wills and Al Thomson have put together an
Excel spreadsheet program which will automatically do the PCI
calculations. Earl Owens has posted a variant of Tom and Al's
spreadsheet on his Philmont website. Tom, Al, and Earl will all be
announcing these efforts on this list later tonight or this weekend.
Hopefully, Justin Dolske will eventually craft a PCI website calculator
similar to his wonderful PPI website calculator.
On the original PPI, I had a number of complaints that people could load
it but couldn't make it work. Turns out they weren't loading it
correctly, so a quick tutorial: Note that you first have to download
the calculator from Tom, Al, or Earl first, into any file subdirectory
(e.g., a WordPerfect or Word document subdirectory is fine). Then, you
have to open the Microsoft Excel program (on most computer setups,
accessed through your Start, then Programs, buttons. The (blank) Excel
program will come up and fill the screen (just a big grid with a typical
multi-function header). Then you go to File --> Open --> [Go to the
subdirectory where you downloaded the .xls calculator, and Double Click
on the calculator .xls program]; the calculator will load into the
program, and you're ready to rock and roll.
Acknowledgements: The emails have been flying over the past week.
Thanks especially to Tom Wills, Al Thomson, Earl Owens, Chris Summers,
and Justin Dolske for their efforts on the original PPI and now the
PCI. Plus to a number of my fellow Troop 111 Philmont Advisors (who you
don't know), especially Rick Wolff and Clay Henderson. And again,
thanks to the nearly 125 responders who provided feedback that enabled
us to craft the new PCI.]
-------------------------------------------------------
Scouting E-mail Discussion Lists @ usscouts.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe at http://usscouts.org/lists/
Listserv Commands at http://usscouts.org/lists/lc.asp
-------------------------------------------------------
Send listserv commands to: listserv@troop47.com
Send postings to: philmont@troop47.com
List FAQ found at: http://usscouts.org/lists/faq.asp
List Administrator: philmont_owner@troop47.com
-------------------------------------------------------
As you gather around this virtual campfire with fellow
Scouts and Scouters, do your best to be trustworthy,
loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient,
cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent.
-------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Thu Mar 13 2003 - 10:37:41 CST