From: Alan R. Hamm (ahamm@alanhamm.com)
Date: Tue Feb 25 2003 - 06:20:48 CST
Please remember that very few of the treks identified in the 2002 book were actually used. Due to the fire, it is likely that no one had those actual treks. For example, we were scheduled for #21, and ended up with #13FM (Fire Modified). We were excited about #21 and disappointed at first about losing it, but have zero complaints about the one we ended up with.
Alan Hamm
----- Original Message -----
From: DM175@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list philmont
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 6:31 PM
Subject: [Philmont]: Preparing for TREK books
I know the 2003 TREK books are still a couple of weeks away, but trying to get a bit of a head start. Was wondering if anyone would like to comment off-list to me concerning pros / cons / considerations for treks #3, #21, #24, #26 from 2002 trek experiences. This could include your results in dealing with the burros. Thanks very much!!!
Bill Penniston
Pony Express Council
St Joseph, MO
DM175@aol.com
-------------------------------------------------------
Scouting E-mail Discussion Lists @ usscouts.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe at http://usscouts.org/lists/
Listserv Commands at http://usscouts.org/lists/lc.asp
-------------------------------------------------------
Send listserv commands to: listserv@troop47.com
Send postings to: philmont@troop47.com
List FAQ found at: http://usscouts.org/lists/faq.asp
List Administrator: philmont_owner@troop47.com
-------------------------------------------------------
As you gather around this virtual campfire with fellow
Scouts and Scouters, do your best to be trustworthy,
loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient,
cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent.
-------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Thu Mar 13 2003 - 10:37:50 CST