RE: [Philmont]: Re: Philmont Package

> In 2001 we used the sectional maps at logistics. In 2003 we
> had to scramble to get the overall map as we had brought the
> sectionals. Since most treks are in at least two sections and
> logistics is not about which trails to use, I can see why it
> makes sense for them to use the overall map.

<in response to a previous post that said>
 
> In 2000, we took the overall map, and they made us go get the
> sectionals.

<in response to an even earlier post that said>
 
> Last year logistics required the overall map for planning.
> We took in the sectional maps and they made us go get an
> overall map. We had to wait over an hour to get into
> logistics after we brought the overall map.

Not intending to flame anyone or put too fine a point on the issue, but:

Since you are likely to have both an overall map (they sent you one with
your package) and the sectionals (for more details while hiking) have
the Crew Leader take both in to Logistics. What's that saying again?
Oh yeah, Be Prepared. Sounds like it sure could save a lot of time and
frustration.

Happy Trails,

Roy Fisher

-------------------------------------------------------
Scouting E-mail Discussion Lists @ usscouts.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe at http://usscouts.org/lists/
Listserv Commands at http://usscouts.org/lists/lc.asp
-------------------------------------------------------
Send listserv commands to: listserv@troop47.com
Send postings to: philmont@troop47.com
List FAQ found at: http://usscouts.org/lists/faq.asp
List Administrator: philmont_owner@troop47.com
-------------------------------------------------------
As you gather around this virtual campfire with fellow
Scouts and Scouters, do your best to be trustworthy,
loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient,
cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent.
-------------------------------------------------------

 
Received on Thu Mar 24 01:06:01 2005